About Me

Name: Red
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

We Need to Control the Debate

We need to control the debate.  For too long the democratic/liberal principles have prevailed.  We have spent our time defending our positions.   It is not enough to argue defensively in response to their claims, I mean how did we become the bad guys?  We have to  create new ones of our own to force them to redefine theirs.
For instance, education, we currently have the no child left behind, a tougher approach but we should be doing more. Lets examin the system and question the bureaucracy, the methods  and the curriculum.  I would ask people to consider the option of expelling children who do not do well when they turn 16, which is the legal working age.   Push the issue of how much of our resources should be put inot a system that is not working? 
 
Question the issue of health care - Ask yourself and them what they think how much coverage  a person actually needs to have.  Think about it, how often do you see the doctor?  How often do you have an emergency?  How often do you have an operation?    A doctor visit is about $100-$150 for a simple problem.  Most people can pay that bill.  For emergency's there are emergency care outfits that you can use rather than a hospital emergency room cost is probably about half the cost of an emergency room which starts at $1,000.  There are options out there to fit ones needs.  Do some research add it up it cannot cost what you are paying for insurance coverage.   Also take note of the fact medicine has become a big business not a care service.  Democrats argue using the insurance comapies pay  policies, how would the government any different?  If care is nationalized we will loose our choice of coverage, the when and where of care and will be paying more than we have too. 
 
There are a lot of issues or platform topics that can be debated on our level.  Ask the question why, what and how for any topic.  Ask yourself, who is bringing this up?  Question the expert's knowledge and motives. Who is the expert and what are their qualifications.  Haven't you notice on the usual media programs or even in the newspaper, the expert is from a university or a PAC, or a columnist.  How do we know that opinion is valid , correct, or even universal.  If your anything like me it usually doesn't match mine. 
 
I am a conservative republican and proud of it because I ask those questions, I read, I have traveled, I went to college and can put two and two together to get four.  I do not buy the liberalism and with every passing day my belief that their actions and beliefs are bad for us grows stronger.
 
There
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It Took Me Five Minutes

 

If you, like me, are frustrated by the actions of our government, the acrimony between the two parties and the inability of the news to present information in fair manner. I thought I would share that it takes me just about five minutes to find the data and or facts about any issue on the internet. 

Did you know, that the US Agencies publish a wealth of information. If you want to know the population statistics on healthcare coverage? The US Census Bureau is your source. If you want to know more about drilling for oil, and what our resources are? Go to the website for the US Department of Energy. I suggest you start with the quick facts link and you usually find what you want.  It has done wonders for my piece of mind. In conversation, you can stump the Democrat. When they scream about the disparity in income.  Ask them which scale they are using. The equivalence-adjusted or the traditional money income concept.  Then in the silence, tell them you know the statistics.

If they want details, reply that you have determined the following:

·        Income is spread pretty evenly over the population.

·        The average median income in the US is $48,201.00. 

·        Only 3.4% of the population is considered at the lowest level, followed by 8.6 and 14.6 and 23.0 respectively according to a quintile scale.

·        Only 22% of the population are in the top 5% of money earners. 

·        This means most Americans fit into the 2-4 quintile range.

·        Traditionally the 3rd and 4th quintile are “middle class”. The 2nd is “lower middle class”. 1 being poor and 5 the wealthiest.

Then explain why you do not want more government mandates to provide relief . 

For example: I recently wrote an opinion on my Townhall Blog “It’s All Relative,” about Massachusetts’s new insurance law.  If you have not read it - Massachusetts’s recently enacted legislation that requires all adults 18 and older to be covered by a healthcare plan. Not any plan but one that includes physician co-pays and a prescription plan. If they do not they pay a tax penalty, losing their exemption plus a fine equal to one half the cost of the yearly premium for the health care plan.  One of the adult victims, is a self-employed single woman with no dependents, her income 25K a year. She has to pay $100 a month for the healthcare plan with all the bells and whistles.

Why so much? Surely that income rates a lower payment.  The one thing they never seem to mention about government programs is the income factor. When it comes to calculating benefits they use a scale, any income over the Federal Poverty Limit counts   against you. Because her gross income is above 200 percent of the federal poverty level,(1 person 10,400.00) she has to pay a graduated rate. By the way she also makes too much to qualify for rental assistance and or food stamps. A democrat may say with the nationalized plan there are guaranteed coverage levels and it is cheaper compared to buying on your own today. That is not the issue. At issue, is the lady’s control of her financial choices.  Also at issue is whether she is better off . Her cost is now a mandatory $100 a month. Now compare that to probable Doctor visits in a year. If only once or twice at $100 a visit she has overspent $800 on health care. Money she could use for groceries, rent, utilities, transportation and clothing. 

Actually only 3.6% of the population will benefit from “free” healthcare. The rest of us, we will have to pay a mandated rate out of our teeny tiny paycheck according to a graduated scale.  Forget about a part-time job in this case, it actually hurts you to earn more as they will raise the premium.  I make $42,000.00, fortunately I have my insurance paid by my employer.   If I didn’t, as I am single and have no dependents,  I would probably be the full rate or more for the same coverage. The quotes I received were about $350.00 a month. I couldn’t afford it. Could You?

I think rather than discuss universal care, how about health care options as choices. How about a fixed rate plan to cover minimal care that includes an annual physical, but no co-pays, prescription reimbursements and partial payment of expensive tests at a low cost.  

That should be a better value and if you have to be hospitalized, or are in an accident there is coverage for that. Oh wait, there is an insurance plan for that it’s called high deductible coverage. Of course there are the HSA’s, (Health Savings Acccounts) You can save pre-tax income to pay for health expenses with no tax penalty. It would be good for the time you have an accident and break your arm. So in conclusion tell the democrat no thanks, I’d rather stick with what’s available and save my money for a rainy day.

FYI below is the 2008 Poverty Guidelines established by the Department of Health and Human Services.

2008 Poverty Guidelines for the 48 Contiguous States
and the District of Columbia
------------------------------------------------------------------------Poverty guideline
Persons in family                        
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.................................................    $10,400
2.................................................     14,000
3.................................................     17,600
4.................................................     21,200
5.................................................     24,800
6.................................................     28,400
7.................................................     32,000
8.................................................     35,600
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
For families with more than 8 persons, add $3,600 for each additional person.
Tags: healthcare  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Confused about Oil?

I didn't know what or who to believe about the oil prices and problems so I did a little research on the web. 
 
This is a quick summary of the information available on-line at the US Department of Energy ( www.doe.gov )
 
US consumption is way up and domestic production is down. It has been dropping since it's peak in the mid eighties.  We are now importing 60% of our oil.
 
The imported oil comes from; Canada 17%, Mexico 12%, Venezuela 10.4% Nigeria 8.1% and Saudi Arabia 10.7%
 
Our refineries are operating at 89% capacity and we have 150 of them.
  
As for the price of gas, 48% is for the crude, 24% is taxes, 16% is refining costs and profits and 12% is distribution and marketing.
 
A barrel is 42 gallons of crude oil - it will produce 19.4 gallons of motor fuel.  (I always wondered what a barrel was)

Proven crude oil reserves (oil that is possible to drill economically with current technologies);  
The largest amounts are in Texas(4,871), Alaska (3,879), off the coast of  Louisiana and Alabama (3,655) and in California (3,389 land mass, offshore shows only 441). 
 
The numbers are in billions of barrels.  I cannot tell if that is total reserves or estimated annual. 
If this is total reserves we have about a 111 years of domestic oil at our current consumption level. (rough mathmatics I added total and divided by current annual consumption)  

Increased production of oil seems to be easy, It takes only about 13 weeks to set up and start pumping crude oil, drilling permits take a about 36 weeks.  The other problem I see is if we produce more oil the refineries are near capacity now (89%) will not be able to produce enough which will cause a shortage for fuel.  There are a lot of products made from oil.   

What I don't know is - if refineries are owned and operated by the oil companies, or do oil companies just drill for the crude and sell it to refineries and other companies who use it to produce products.  I want to know becasue it relates to the windfall profit tax, - who is making the money.   A google search  for oil producers showed me about 26 companies; Exxon-Mobile, Standard Oil, and Hess  are some names that stood out on the list.  There were a couple firms who specialized in drilling, both on and off shore.  Otherwise it will take a lot more looking.  I am inclined to believe it is another stunt by Democrats in Congress to stifle production for the environmentalists and possibly get money for their dead end programs.
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How About Telling Them to Shut UP?

Hello,
 
I think it is time to start telling the progressive liberals in America to shut up.  Not new I know but if we try to contact "our enemies" on their web sites, or via newspapers and combine it with letters to any other sources outside the US Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, India, Malaysia, Britian, France, Germany and  the "must" states of Iran, Afghanistan (Talibans), Saudia Arabia, Syria, North Korea, Indonesia, Phillipins etc.  in short worlwide, we might have a chance of being heard. 
 
 For example this is what I would like to say:
 
Hello from an American  lost in liberal America. 
 
Please know that there are those here who are not well represented in the media or considered for opinion polls.  What you hear as opinion or supporting events is not from us but from a liberal media machine and we would like to be sure that you hear what we have to say. 
 
Troop withdrawal? Americans against the war?  For my part I wouldn't mind withdrawing our troops and leaving you alone as long as you promise to target your hatred better.  How about George Soros and members of Move on.org, Berkley and San Francisco California, the New York Times, the Columbia School of Journalism, Jane Fonda (that would win you an unofficial medal from about 70% of the population) and  Hollywood (you would save us from a lot of crap plus get a big medal from 90% of the population).  These are the people who are causing the trouble not me.  I do not like the progressive liberal in america either and I am tired of taking it on the chin for them.  I don't like the direction we are going in and absolutely do not want more "change" whatever that means (it depends on the cause of the week).  Globalism and political correctness is very unpopular here too.  I mourn the loss of values and virtues and think the "American Dream" has been perverted. 
 
For the record, I do not care what you do or believe in as long as you leave me out of it. It is your country, your home and your life.    I am sorry you feel as if your culture is being lost to "Americanization"  I understand  because we are losing ours too.   
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Health Care in Massachussetts, a commentary

I recently saw a special on the new state requirement.  Adults 18 and over have to have health insurance or pay a penalty.  If they do not purchase a health care plan (one that meets the mandated minimums) they will loose thier personal exemption off thier tax return plus pay a penalty equal to one half the premium of the lowest price plan available.  Now take a person who is a cashier at wal-mart, they make what minimum wage which is about 12,168 dollars a year provided they work forty hours a week and get a paid vacation.  Wal mart may provide health insurance at a discount and deduct from an already low salary or if not that person has to find a plan that meets the following critieria.
 
prescription drugs(may have a deductible $250 individual /$500 Family
Regular doctor visits (co-pay no specified)
Annual deductible capped at $2,000 Individual/ 4,000 family
No cap on total benefits for a sickness or for each year
No cap on spending for a day in the hospital.
 
I am not an expert on cost but I think this type of coverage will not be cheap.  For an indivudual like me and with a $2500 deductible and no prescription it is $327.94 a month. (went on a web site to request a quote).  You may be able to obtain a waiver if you can prove you cannot afford health insurance that meets the standards.   
but
They offer a state run insurance called the Commonwealth Connector.  If your family income is less than 300% of the Federal poverty level you may be able to purchase a Commonwealth Care plan.  Now lets see the federal poverty for an individual in 2008 is $10,400
at 300% that means income has to be less than $31,200 a year.  The show interviewed a woman who was self employed and made $25,000 a year.  Her premium under the plan was $100/month.  She says she cannot afford it you know what with rent, untilities, fuel (if she has a car) and food.  She has a good case for complaint.  Since her premium is based upon income,  a second job won't help as her premium will go up. 
 
I have a suggestion.
It is cheaper for this lady to pay the fine and loose the tax exemption.  At $50 a month plus the $219 exemption her fine will be only $819. verses the 1,200.00 she pays for coverage.  Put the $300 in a federal pre-tax health savings account.
 
Thats the problem with government mandates or help, the income qualifier, It's only for the really really poor and hurts those who can barely afford it. 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Politics of Gimmie

Gimmie this gimmie that.  This is the real problem in America. To get elected the average democrat has to get his voters something.  That’s how they are getting elected. Of course the voter knows they are crooked, politically on the edge, and/or morally bankrupt.  They get them stuff and they justify the actions of their representative by using the “oh poor me”, “you can’t let that happen” or minority arguments.  The republicans can’t win  with the moral compass, spending cuts, and doing the right thins.  That is the power of the Democratic Party and the doom we all face unless we get past the "gimmie".  There is a bright point - they are losing ground.  As people are fed-up or want more than can be delivered.  Evidence of this is the popularity level of  Congress which is at an all time low.   Even though the press and others say it is because of this and that.   We all have to admit that our legistative branch of the is now a big bloated machine.  It is time to get rid of the fat. No, no votes for Obama here.  He is using this discontent to try and get elected.

 It is time to get back to basics, read the Federalist Papers and the Constitution again or if you have not done so be sure to read them.  The arguments presented in the Federalist Papers are timeless and still appropriate for our times.  They should be forming the basis of debate in America today not the liberal vs conservative.

 I am a conservative, I believe in a limited federal government and we need that again. Get rid of half the departments such as Health and Human Services, The Department of Labor, the EPA, those affairs are something that should be handled by the state not the federal government.  FEMA, the states not the Federal Government.  Keep those deaprtmetns that serve the nation with the Federal Government.  The rest can be adopted by the states, many already have them.

 Think about it. This way foolish actions are limited to a specific area not affecting the whole country.


 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »